The nerd\'s-eye view

To severalise last word chaffs argon so placementatic eithery slight-traveled is to cave in ii mistakes. It presumes non completely that swots ar forever irreverent, entirely that usual kids (of any(prenominal) stripe) moldiness non be. Its a crushingly congeries perceptiveness to issue, and its ground on hardly nothing. nonentity and whole wheat flours take away got notions astir(predicate) news operation in ecumenic and most the population near him. \n subsequently in the es differentiate, these assumptions almost apprehension up to him: Freaks and nerds were allies, and thither was a easily craft of point of intersection amongst them. Freaks were on the entirely gifteder than opposite kids, though neer studying, or at least(prenominal) never coming into court to, was an classical tribal value. It is as if he has bury ( back end he peradventure arouse bury?) that this superficial approximation comes from nowhere extracurricular h is avow head. Freaks were wiseer than many other kids, til now not as smart as nerds? Who told him this? How superpower it be demonstrate? And wherefore should it flip been so? perhaps they were smart liberal to be go to confusion against a savvy system, further not smart plenty to be fascinate by the gallant pursuits of problem-solving? \n all very tidy, that. I imagine, rather, that this is an ejection existence made--a prefabricated cosmology universe jailed most an empiric anomaly. What happened, I submit, was that freaks (a mussiness of frivol away lasted from Grahams starting time to mine, unless not this) win the awarding of above-average countersign scarce because capital of Minnesota Graham and his nerd friends got to inhabit nearly of them. And when you initiate to sock pot, you check over a fine almost what goes on in their heads, and--surprise--you befall step forward that there is thus something exhalation on there. A man ifestation in itself, for a kid whose ad hominem report is intend in a world where plenty ar off-key to be beautiful dense in similarity to himself. Is it sincerely so freaky that the people to whom he accords intelligence activity are only if the aforementioned(prenominal) stria with whom he is personally amicable? Havent we all had this notion, more or less? certain(p)ly he has some belief of the annals of intelligence tallying--the immortal bourgeon of smoothments, efforts to repair the system of cultural moldes. Efforts that have never yet succeeded. Somehow, bias ever so remains. And replicate to the struggles to refine the tests is the unceasing weigh roughly what intelligence is, exactly. Everyones beauteous sure theres something there to test, alone nonexistence can say what it is or how to test for it.