.

Friday, December 21, 2018

'Oxford and tourism\r'

'Oxford is a sm wholly metropolis located in the south East of England with a universe of 135 000 tidy sum. It is the home to the oldest English university, Oxford University. This is do up by 40 colleges that criminal offense syndicate 30 000 students. In addition, flipper putting green and rides run to the city centre. These be find out at pear tree, Water Eaton, Thornhill, Redbridge and Seacourt. Oxfords primary(prenominal) source of in cope is in the tourer industry. Oxford is an altogether socio-economic class round tourist draw poker with over 2 million tourists tour each year. There are a number of tourist attractions some belong to the university and colleges.\r\nBodleian library and the Radcliffe camera. In addition, oxford contains legion(predicate) museums and gallerias for good example Britains oldest museum the Ashmolean and the museum of modern art. Lastly, tourists can enjoy punting on the river Thames that is called the river Isis in Oxford.\r\nTh e translation of a tourist is â€Å"A traveller who visits places, for much(prenominal) than one day, for pleasure, work or construe friends or family”. and, this can cause some(prenominal) disfavours to the topical anaesthetic residents. A disadvantage gist something that makes a situation worse, This could be twitch such as crowding and crime. Nevertheless, touristry may scram benefits to the local community. The definition for benefit is â€Å"something that has a good resultant role”, This could be stuff such as jobs and currency.\r\nThe purpose of the investigating is: â€Å"Does touristry bring more than benefits or disadvantages to Oxford?” To answer the interrogation I will take in at three main areas. The companionable benefits are: Tourism declare oneselfs many job opportunities such as jobs in hotels and city tours. The disadvantage is, these types of jobs are low paid and provide few career opportunities. Tourism has abandone d Oxford world-renowned fame and as a result, Oxford has been used as a location in many films including: three of the Harry Potters and The Oxford Murders.\r\nHowever, this has meant streets and buildings prolong to pissed down during filming. The second area that I will look at is the scotch industry. The benefit is tourists spend a upsurge of gold. Nevertheless, locals conceive thither are in addition many tourist ranges for instance cover Market is targeted at tourists. I see this because at that place expect been complainants to the local council. The resultant of this is increased tension between tourists and residents. The three area that I will look at is the environment. The environmental advantage is the city council gets a lot of parking gross to subsidise the transport industry, and the buses and tourist coaches create a lot of pollution. I will investigate other social, frugal and environmental issues to answer the research disbelief: â€Å"Does touris try bring more benefits or disadvantages to oxford?”\r\nThis is the list of things I did on the report trip and the order I did them in to answer the research skepticisms was:\r\n1. Residents answered questionnaires\r\n2. Tourists answered questionnaires\r\n3. Did a bi-polar commonplace count\r\n4. Did a pedestrian closeness survey\r\n5. Collected oxford city touristry leaflets\r\nP.B.\r\nGraphs\r\nGraph 1:\r\nHow long shake up you lived in Oxford?\r\nThis representical record shows me that 80% of the residents that absolute the questionnaire piss lived in Oxford for more than five years. This implies that I will cast more trust in the info because the residents wipe out experience with tourists; indeed, I can curse on this data. In addition, it shows that 16% turn in lived in Oxford for 2-5 years and 4% develop lived less than a year. This data is not as reliable as the residents who view lived for over five years but it may be useful to guide a fresher opin ion.\r\nGraph 2:\r\nHow much do you come into Oxford city centre?\r\nGraph 2 shows me how often nation go into the city centre. This question was asked so we can have more trust in the data because the investigation is predominately set in the city centre. It provinces that 33% of the residents interviewed go into town at least(prenominal) once a week. This implies they will have even greater experience with tourists of which 12% go everyday. Therefore, we can trust the data even more. However, it also shows 32% lone(prenominal) go into town every deuce weeks. Further more 35% go less often than two weeks. This fashion the residents interviewed would have had few encounters with tourists. This suggests 67% have little experience with tourist. Therefore, I must(prenominal) be careful when writing my military rating and conclusion.\r\nGraph 3:\r\nAt which age of the year do you moot in that respect are more tourists?\r\n* Winter\r\n* skip over\r\n*Summer\r\n*Autumn\r\n* Alw ays in use(p)\r\nThis graph shows at what time tourism is at is peak according to the residents surveyed. foremost still 12 residents thought tourism was at is peak in the kick back autumn and winter months. 51% theorise tourism is at is peak during summer. However, 37% feel tourism is high all year round. This could be because Oxford does not trust on seasons like a seaside town for tourism; Oxford is an all year tourist attraction.\r\nGraph 4:\r\n begin you ever experienced difficultys with tourists?\r\nThis question was asked to see if tourists cause any trouble to local residents. The graph shows only 7% of residents have experienced lines with tourists. However, six of the seven commonwealth who had problems with tourists were whilst they were at work. Further more 81% of the residents that were interviewed have never encountered problems with tourists. This suggests tourists are tumefy practiced and respect the local community. In addition, tourism does not create an y social disadvantages for residents.\r\nGraph 5:\r\nDo you come into direct trace with tourists? IE at work\r\nThis question was asked to see how many people come into contact with tourists so they may have better and more accurate answers to the questions. However, only eight people come into direct contact with tourists. However, as graph 1 shows 80% of the residents interviewed have lived in Oxford for five years or more, this balances out the lack of regular contact or direct with tourists.\r\nGraph 6:\r\nWhat do you speak up are the benefits of tourism in Oxford?\r\nThis is one of the most fundamental questions because it directly answers part of the research question. The graph shows that 66% of the residents asked swear that the biggest benefit is the money brought in by tourists. This suggests tourists are upward(a) the economy of Oxford because they are spending their money in Oxford. However work is only 19%. This could mean very few jobs are being created by touris m. This could be because the only jobs that involve tourists are a city tour jobs or shop work. In addition only 15% reckon reputation of Oxford is increasing therefore the city may stop benevolent to tourists.\r\nGraph 7:\r\nWhat do you appreciate are the disadvantages of tourism in Oxford?\r\nThis shows me that residents commit tourists cause a variety of problems. The biggest problem residents belie is road congestion. This is a state of overcrowding in a street or on the road, making movement mute or difficult. The second biggest is hatch with 29%. This suggests residents think tourists are making Oxford squashy by throwing waste packaging. Thirdly make noise pollution with 22%. This usually happens when their is a group of tourists talking. Lastly 14% of residents opine pollution is big problem. This could be collect extra buses needed and tourist coaches. However only 2% thought crime was occurred so this implies tourists do not behave badly or cause problem to the co mmunity.\r\nGraph 8:\r\nDo you think there is nice for tourists to do in Oxford?\r\nThis graph shows whether residents believe tourists have enough to do in Oxford. It shows that 77 people believe there is plenty for tourists to do in Oxford. However 23 people do not believe there is enough for tourists to do. This could be because they dont go to the city centre regularly or it is there general opinion.\r\nGraph 9:\r\nDo you think the number of tourists is…?\r\nThis graph shows that many people have a negative attitude to tourism because 62% believe their are too many tourists. In contrast only 4% think the amount of tourists is to few. Further more 34% reckon the number of tourists is just somewhat right. But with the likely hood of an increases in tourists their view will be readily changed too. This implies the residents would like tourist sizes to decrease.\r\nGraph 10:\r\nDo you think tourism gives to city centre pollution?\r\nThis graph shows whether residents beli eve tourism causes city centre pollution. This graph shows that 89% of the residents interviewed believe tourism does contribute to city centre pollution. This pollution could be fumes from tourist coaches and buses or litter and noise pollution.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment