The Invasion Of Panama :: essays research papers fc

The Invasion of skimmerThe U.S. violation of Panama on declination 20, 1989 was a mark ofexcellence on the behalf of the U.S. armed forces ability to efficaciously use theprinciples of war. The years leading up to the invasion set the mood forconflict medicate trafficking became a major problem between Panama and the U.S. inthe 1980s, as well as Manuel Noriegas interference with the Panama grooveemployees rights under the Panama Canal agreement the final action that sparkedthe invasion was Noriegas attempt to fix the national election and the militaryenforcement of the fix afterward the election. at once this took place the U.S. beganto make a plan for the invasion. The overwhelming supremacy of this missionstemmed from the U.S. militarys competent use of the principals of war.     The primary success of a mission is the ability to define an overallattainable objective for the mission. In the formulation of the mission toinvade Panama, the U.S. militar y set out four-spot main objectives of the mission.First, they wanted to "protect American lives" (Watson 69). This meant theywanted to protect the lives of the 35,000 U.S. citizens in Panama from attacksby Noriegas Panama Defense Force or PDF they similarly wanted to protect the livesof Americans at home by attempting to eliminate drug trafficking. Second, theywanted to "protect American interests and rights under the Panama Canal Treaty"(Watson 69). This could be done by abolishing Noriegas control of the workerswho operate the canalize, and his control of the canal itself. Third, they wantedto "restore a democratic and freely elected regime to Panama" (Watson 107).Here, the U.S. would gain control over the country and ensure a fair election.And, finally, they wanted to "apprehend Noriega" (Watson 69) for prosecution inthe U.S.. This would ease the worry of restoring democracy and eliminatingdrug trafficking, as well as giving Americans a feeli ng that justice was beingserved. These objectives gave the mission clear goals to achieve, allowing forthe planing of each parturiency that needed to be completed in order to accomplish themission.     Once objective has been established, the next step was to derive asimple plan, sideline the principle of simplicity, which is the formation of"Direct, simple plans and clear, concise orders to minimize misunderstanding and admiration" (Stofft 7). That is just what the U.S. did. They used direct andsimple plans to carry out their mission that is not to say the invasion was asimple operation, on the contrary, the operate and control measures were verydifficult. Thus, the plan was as simple as it could be with concern to the