Spiritual Assessment Tool Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

un brush offny Assessment Tool - Research Paper ExampleThis can lead to m any doctors not addressing patients phantasmal needs effectively enough during general consultation and practice, as well as in particular proposition circumstances. To combat this, a number of spiritual assessment tools soak up sprung up, hoping to bridge the gap between patients and health c be providers in this respect. This essay allow analyze and evaluate the ease of use and comprehensiveness of information collected of two different spiritual assessment tools, the FICA tool and the HOPE tool. Spiritual assessment tools are simply something that is supposed to aid a health care provider in gathering any information that may make the patient more comfortable, happy and able to recover. They head for the hills to be a guide to the kind of questions a health care provider could be pick uping, and as such tend to take on a somewhat un-methodological approach. Both the FICA and the HOPE tools are pulm onary devices that are supposed to kick in a health care provider touchstone ideas that they should inquire about when dealing with a patient. They have some basic similarities and differences in terms of ease of use. The similarities in ease of use have to do with the fact that both assessment tools are based on the same foundation a pneumonic device intended to remind a health care provider what questions they may want to ask a patient. ... ts a relatively high ease of use, as any information ga in that respectd will be of some use to the health care provider and there is no need for an staring(a) questionnaire that could be both awkward and not apply to everyone, causing issues of oppression and exclusivity as well as not giving accurate information. The overall ease of use of both assessment tools is rather high. though the main structure of both assessment tools is relatively similar, and their overall ease of use is relatively high, there are some major differences between t he two tests. One of the most noticeable differences is utility of the pneumonic device. The whole purpose of a pneumonic device is to aid in remembering the steps to use, alone the HOPE acronym tends to not unavoidably connect to the idea in the best possible manner. The H for instance, can stand for hope, but the health care provider will also need to consider sources of meaning, comfort, strength, peace, love and connection (Anandarajah, 2001). Furthermore, P stands for the P in personal spirituality or practices, so is not needfully connected to the most important word (spirituality) and the E stands for effects of medical care and end of manner issues, again, not necessarily connecting the most accessible idea (Anandarajah, 2001). HOPE sacrifices a good deal of its memory-assistance to have a good pneumonic device. FICA takes the opposite approach. While HOPE is a pneumonic device that is on the face of it and integrally related to the idea of spirituality and healing, but whose various(prenominal) letters do not necessarily fit with the ideas and concepts as well, FICA is a nonsense word with no connection to spirituality and healing, but has individual letters that fit very well with the ideas and concepts. In FICA, the F