Review: The House of the Spirits

In the novel, The House of the Spirits, the author, Isabel Allende uses the typeism of the house on the command and the viewpoints of Esteban and Claras notebooks to show the reviewer that in say to understand the biography of the Trueba family, four-fold viewpoints must be taken into consideration. Through the use of symbolism, the house on the corner is interpreter of the Truebas chronicle and how the familys history is told by dichotomy. The house has cardinal mental synthesiss that must be observed in order to understand the blameless home, one being inspired by Esteban, and the other(a) being inspired by Clara.The coordinate that Esteban builds is the outside and the foundation of the house. Esteban builds a cubic, dense, pompous house, which sits like a hat amidst its green and geometric environment(92). This description represents how he tells his stories of history in the novel. Esteban doesnt use magic realism, he has much less narrative in comparison to Clara in the novel, and his writing is straightforward. The way Esteban is portrayed proves the exterior of the house to be representative of his fib as it is cubic and dense.In contrast, Claras register from her notebooks is much different from Estebans simple narration like the structure of the house. Clara doesnt talk solely about important events, she as well records trivialities (1) and incidents that do not necessarily acquire to anything. Claras peculiar and witching(prenominal) narration style is represented by the infrastructure of the house, full of protuberances and incrustations, of twisted staircases that lead to empty spaces, of turrets, or small windows and could not be opened, doors hanging in midair, and crooked hallways (92).The two narrations shape up the entire Trueba history the same way the infrastructure and the outside make up the entire house. each(prenominal) story is told in a different style to symbolize the structure of the house. Estebans part in the creation of the exterior of the house is uninfected and dense which parallels the way he tells history. In contrast Claras narration is more detailed, superfluous and includes the nuanced stories of the characters. Together, the exterior and interior make up the house, mediocre as the two narrations make up the novel and the history of the Truebas.With solitary(prenominal) one narrator, Clara or Esteban speaking at a time, the story of the Trueba family becomes skewed and unreliable due to Estebans personal bias and Claras magical point of view. With both histories presented the ratifier understands a more accurate and distinguish story. Allende uses the dichotomy of the house on the corner as a symbol to show that at that place atomic number 18 four-fold sides to history. We also assemble two sides of history by means of Claras notebooks and Estebans narration.With two narrations we get a nationwide vision of history that can only be bumped by reading multiple perspec tives. One way that Allende uses the narrations to show that understanding multiple viewpoints is necessary, is through the unreliability of the narrator. At the beginning of the novel we first have intercourse magical realism when Claras Uncle Marcos leaves the country on a fizzle that he builds and against all logic, on the second try the bird lifts sour without mishap and with a current elegance, accompanied by the creaking of its human body and the roar of its motor.Flapping its wings and disappearing into the clouds(13). We are unaware of what rattling occurred in this event because we only see one perspective of what happened. erstwhile both narrators are used in the novel, the reader is able to see more than one perspective of the events told and the reader is able to see the entire history, just like the exterior and the infrastructure of the house on the corner make up the entire house.Estebans narration is biased and unreliable, exactly through the use of Claras no tebooks we see the other side to Estebans time at Tres Marias as the presenter. When Esteban recalls his leadership at Tres Marias he says, no ones going to convince me that I wasnt a good patron(51) and that he has been a good patron theres no doubt about it(54). Shortly after, we hear from Claras notebooks of how not a little girl passed from puberty to adulthood that Esteban did not subject to the woods, the riverbank, or the wrought-iron bed(63).If the reader only heard Estebans narration, the reader would have only seen that he rebuilt chicken coops and stables, rescued the oil fields, and planned an irrigation system so the crops wouldnt have to depend on the weather(53). During his narration the reader sees all the positive things that he did, but with Claras notebooks the reader also sees the negative aspects of his time at Tres Marias. Along with seeing different events that occurred with multiple narrations we also see the feelings of multiple characters.When Clara first arrives at Tres Marias she feels that she has finally detect her mission in life(105). While the reader understands her motivation, Esteban is unaware that she has this take up to fulfill her mission in life. Esteban thinks she is just charitable and generous and wants to make those around her happy-except Esteban(178). Due to the telling of two narratives in the history of the Trueba family we are able to see the relationship dynamics from both sides, and as a result, understand the Trueba family history better.In conclusion, Isabel Allende wrote the novel in a certain way to show the reader a different view of how history could be learned. She used the symbol of the house to show that to see the history there are various perspectives to understand just as there are various structures that make up the entire house. Allende wrote the novel through the perspective of Clara, Esteban, and others, so the reader is able to get the most comprehensive telling of the Trueba family histor y, and can see multiple sides in order to obtain the best understanding.